Good Food Review

Is this asking for a review on a good food? Or is it asking for a good review on food? Or is it supposed to be about what constitutes a good review on food? These blog posts really need to be explained. But I'll do the latter, because that is what I assume you [Mr. McCarthy] meant.

First of all, a good review of food takes in more than just the food. It has to evaluate any other factors that affect our impressions of the food. A good restaurant review takes in all that adds to the food. The ambiance, the service, and especially the people. The people one eats with to the other customers all make a difference to the impression the place and the food leaves on someone. When making an unbiased review on a restaurant, one should go alone. When making an unbiased review on simply a dish, someone must travel and eat that dish prepared by various people to get an overall feeling. Our memories of a restaurant, and the food ate are formed by the sum of the factors mentioned before. When we are asked if we would go back, we do not simply remember how the food tasted, but how we felt as we ate it. The environment is the strongest spice for food.